On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Mike Gilbert <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 25, 2013 at 4:59 PM, Stefan G. Weichinger <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Just found that I have a blocking situation ... systemd and udev don't >> "like each other" right now ;-) >> >> Tried various maskings ... and found some hints in the Changelog here: >> >> http://gentoo-portage.com/sys-fs/udev/ChangeLog#ptabs >> >> this lead me to this bugreport: >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462750 >> >> ... it is flagged "RESOLVED FIXED" and I am digging for the solution ... >> the latest comment (at the very moment >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=462750#c45) there says "Let's >> not discuss blocker problems on this bug report please." >> >> ok ... >> >> So I just stay with sys-fs/udev-198-r5 and sys-apps/systemd-198-r2 for >> now and look forward to the things coming :-) >> >> Anyone in here already hit that? Suggestions? >> >> Best regards, Stefan >> >> > > I feel your pain. That bug report got out of control so I wanted to > put a stop to the comments. > > I am happy to help you work out your blocker issue here, or in a new bug > report.
Oh, some suggestions: 1. Make sure your portage tree is up to date. 2. Make sure your use flags for virtual/udev and sys-apps/systemd are synced up. 3. Run equery d sys-fs/udev to see if you have any packages depending on it directly. 4. Add sys-fs/udev and sys-fs/eudev to /etc/portage/package.mask to see if you can get portage to emit a more useful message.
