Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:33:34 -0600, Dale wrote: > >> Putting /usr on LVM is not the problem. I have had /usr on LVM for a >> good long while now. It has booted just fine. The new udev is what is >> going to break it, whether I use LVM or not from what has been said on >> this list and elsewhere. > I've been running separate /usr on LVM with ~arch udev and no initramfs > on a couple of systems with no problems. The news item is taking the easy > way out by saying "it will break" rather than "it may break" - such > breakage is by no means certain - although the future holds no > guarantees. > >
Then there is my luck. Right? Dale :-) :-) -- I am only responsible for what I said ... Not for what you understood or how you interpreted my words!
