On 8/27/05, David Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been having alot of luck with openvpn it's ssl based rather than
ipsec.  I have found it to be easier to setup and less confusing and
it has clients for various platforms including windows...which is not
always the easiest platform to use IPSEC with unless you go with a
commercial client.  You will need to setup a certificate authority and
understand the basics of openssl the rest is pretty simple.  It even
works behind a NAT router or firewall.  If the vpn connection is lost
it will re-establish it's connection automatically once it's routable
again.  This works for both dynamic ip clients and even the server as
long as you're using some sort of deamon to update dyndns info.

Are there any security trade-offs with SSL as opposed to IPSEC?

On 8/26/05, Michael W. Holdeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:

> I want to be able to access a desktop machine, and most importantly the bsd
> file server with my laptop, again with a dynamic assigned ip from remote
> locations.

I know not (naught? :) about the VPN but as far as your dynamic IP goes I use changeip.com with great success. They are farily cheap and you can send them a top level domain. The nice part is to update the DNS records you can download a really simple Bash script and cron it to make the updates.

-Mike

--
________________________________
Michael E. Crute
Software Developer
SoftGroup Development Corporation

Linux, because reboots are for installing hardware.
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?"

Reply via email to