120520 Michael Mol wrote: > as Philip later remarked, it turns out the lens was likely a 75mm prime
The picture of the camera looks exactly what I remember, tho' there might have been different models with different lenses. It was a very good camera for its time. > The leftmost portion will never look all that great, > as he captured the Sun setting behind a building > or maybe that's a water spot The Sun was indeed setting to the left at that time + date, but the bluish blemish is some sort of physical decay in the negative, which was stored in a cardboard box for c 55 yr without being touched. > If these source JPG files are scans of paper photos No, they're 2 overlapping scans of the same negative, whose size is 58 x 43 mm = 2,3 x 1,7 inch . > Anyway, the final Hugin pto file is here: http://pastebin.com/gudxvAEa What is a 'pto' file ? -- I downloaded it & it's text. > And the final stitch is here: > http://img407.imageshack.us/img407/2030/brum3068brum30702.jpg All Firefox gives me is a black window : can you check ? -- ========================,,============================================ SUPPORT ___________//___, Philip Webb ELECTRIC /] [] [] [] [] []| Cities Centre, University of Toronto TRANSIT `-O----------O---' purslowatchassdotutorontodotca
