On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 12:10:25AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote: > > Though it is silly IMHO that portage would want to remove itself > > with depclean. Could it not be hardcoded into portage that it > > should try to keep itself updated and not commit suicide? > > (Independently of the @system sets.) > > What about replacing portage with paludis? In your scenario, portage > could not do that.
emerge paludis and then use paludis to remove portage? W -- Willie W. Wong ww...@math.princeton.edu Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire et vice versa ~~~ I. Newton