On Thu, Aug 04, 2011 at 12:10:25AM +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> > Though it is silly IMHO that portage would want to remove itself
> > with depclean. Could it not be hardcoded into portage that it
> > should try to keep itself updated and not commit suicide?
> > (Independently of the @system sets.)
> 
> What about replacing portage with paludis? In your scenario, portage 
> could not do that.

emerge paludis and then use paludis to remove portage?

W
-- 
Willie W. Wong                                     ww...@math.princeton.edu
Data aequatione quotcunque fluentes quantitae involvente fluxiones invenire 
         et vice versa   ~~~  I. Newton

Reply via email to