On Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:35:55 -0400, Albert Hopkins wrote: > Having said that: > One of encfs's Achilles heel is its dependency on the boost C++ library > which is *very* sensitive wrt to API/ABI changes and the like. It also > depends on OpenSSL which also shares this notoriety (although, in my > experience, less so). So there is a possibility that an update to any > of those packages may have broken encfs and you need to rebuild the > package.
Apart from the need to access legacy data, which Harry has resolved by reformatting, is there any benefit in using encfs rather than the in-kernel ecryptfs these days? -- Neil Bothwick Fine day for a good workout. Steal something heavy.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
