Am Samstag, 25. Juni 2011, 10:09:17 schrieb Marc Joliet: > Am Fri, 24 Jun 2011 16:12:26 -0700 > > schrieb kashani <kashani-l...@badapple.net>: > > I've noticed this a couple of times this week. A few of you have > > > > responded to the annoying Fortran thread, changed the subject, started a > > new message, and sent the email starting a new thread. > > I have not noticed this. Scanning through the thread, I do not see any > subject changes. > > > Because you responded to an existing thread you are not creating a new > > > > thread and thus and reducing the size of the audience that reads your > > email. Specially I'd have responded to "open source monitoring on > > gentoo", but since I deleted the Fortran thread in its boring entirety I > > didn't even see it until I saw a response further down the chain today. > > Whoever started Fbsplash did the same thing. > > For me, both of the threads you mention appear as their own threads (using > claws-mail). So I checked the email sources and could not find any > "References" headers in either of the thread parents. So, perhaps this is > a bug in Thunderbird? > > > kashani > > HTH
same here, no thread problems with kde-base/kmail-4.4.11.1 Maybe you should really check your client. Greets
