Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:43:02 +0200 (CEST), Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote:

2.2, it's listed as ~*2.2.0_alpha41, too early for me. Thanks all for
the help
Don't let the ridiculous version number fool you, 2.2 has been
generally usable for a couple of years.



+1 I been using it here for a good while now. Other than the occasional surprise of feature enhancements, it has been fine.

Dale

:-)  :-)

Reply via email to