Neil Bothwick wrote:
On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 14:43:02 +0200 (CEST), Alain DIDIERJEAN wrote:2.2, it's listed as ~*2.2.0_alpha41, too early for me. Thanks all for the helpDon't let the ridiculous version number fool you, 2.2 has been generally usable for a couple of years.
+1 I been using it here for a good while now. Other than the occasional surprise of feature enhancements, it has been fine.
Dale :-) :-)