On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:02:23 +0100, Stroller wrote: > I like the idea of package.use as a directory of indie files, but > haven't bothered switching over because this works so well for me. The > package.use directory system seems too simple to be true - is it really > no more complex than a directory of any-named files of the same format?
Yes. -- Neil Bothwick Top Oxymorons Number 3: Working vacation
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature