On Fri, 24 Jun 2011 13:02:23 +0100, Stroller wrote:

> I like the idea of package.use as a directory of indie files, but
> haven't bothered switching over because this works so well for me. The
> package.use directory system seems too simple to be true - is it really
> no more complex than a directory of any-named files of the same format?

Yes.


-- 
Neil Bothwick

Top Oxymorons Number 3: Working vacation

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to