On Saturday 18 December 2010 10:18:43 Neil Bothwick wrote:
> On Fri, 17 Dec 2010 22:56:29 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote:
> > I've bought (against my better judgement) an Atom N270 box to be a LAN
> > server, but it's a bit slow compared with the other boxes on the
> > network. A big bit, actually - 69 minutes to compile a kernel compared
> > with less than 9 minutes on this workstation.
> > 
> > I thought I'd give distcc a go, but after reading the Gentoo distcc and
> > crossdev guides and doing what they say I get no result. I might just
> > as well not have made the effort. The Atom box just labours with the
> > emerge without trying to send anything to the server box I've set up
> > for the purpose.
> 
> I've found there's just too much overhead with distcc, plus much of the
> work is still done locally. I have a couple of Atom boxes, a server and a
> netbook, and I've set up a chroot for each on my workstation. In the
> chroot I have FEATURES=buildpkg, using an NFS mounted PKGDIR available to
> both computers, then I emerge -k on the Atom box.

I've been experimenting with nfs-mounting the whole Atom file system to /target 
in a chroot on my workstation, then setting --root=/target and --config-
root=/target on every portage command. I can't recommend it.

Numerous packages require to be installed into both the chroot and the target. 
I 
suppose that's not too onerous, even though I haven't found a way to predict 
which packages will be affected, but I've found that, when I go back to the 
Atom 
box and emerge -pkuv world, a lot of the packages that should already have been 
upgraded haven't been, and I have to emerge them on the Atom box directly.

The states of the target and the native chroot are neither consistent nor 
independent - it's a mess.

It was a nice idea to enable portage to work in this way, but it's still full 
of 
holes. Maybe all packages need some extra configuring; I don't know. A lot more 
work is definitely needed by someone, at any rate.

I've decided to revert to Neil's method (once I've shaken this infection off).

-- 
Rgds
Peter

Reply via email to