On Sun, 2011-01-16 at 12:33 +0000, Peter Humphrey wrote: > On Sunday 16 January 2011 12:19:38 Peter Ruskin wrote: > > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=351829 > > So it is. That was quick. I don't agree with his suggestion, which seems > to imply requiring all KDE systems to be built with +accessibility, like > it or not. > Not exactly. His suggestion is that everything should have the same defaults. Some qt packages default to +accessibility, others default to -accessibility. Then there's a third group that depends packages from both groups having consistent US flags, meaning you're forced to set the USE flag (either + or -) on at least one package or your build fails.
Since +accessibility doesn't appear to pull in any extra packages, just enable some extra Qt widgets to be built, I don't really see any reason it should *default* to off. You could globally set USE=-accessibility if you really don't like it. --Mike
