Andrea Conti <a...@alyf.net> [10-06-07 20:28]: > > Does anyone has experiences with gparted? > > I have no experience with Parted Magic, but I have used a lot the > Gparted live CD (http://gparted.sourceforge.net/livecd.php). No idea on > how the two compare. > > As for gparted (which is a lot more than a gui for parted), I have used > it on ext4 a couple of times and it managed to complete the copy without > destroying anything, so I'd say it works. On the other hand, I copied > *lots* of ext3 and ntfs partitions, and it never failed me. > > BTW, by default gparted does *not* do sector-by-sector partition copies. > In my opinion this is a much better approach if you do not need a > bit-exact copy of the original (e.g. if you're doing forensics or > debugging filesystems), but in the end it's up to you. > > andrea >
Hi Andreas, do I understand right here: Instead of using dcfldd or simply dd to copy one disk to another for backup reasons it is much better/faster to use gparted to simply copy all partitions from sda to sdb using sda1=>sdb1, sda2=>sdb2,... and so forth? Is there something like a "batch job" or scripting interface for gparted so that I can give gparted the complete copy job once, go to sleep and next moring the copy is done? Is gparted able to shut down the system after finishing its work or to end itsself so a little script can detect the job is done and halt the system then? Best regards, mcc -- Please don't send me any Word- or Powerpoint-Attachments unless it's absolutely neccessary. - Send simply Text. See http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html In a world without fences and walls nobody needs gates and windows.
