On 2010-05-13 7:21 PM, walt wrote: > AFAIK most laptops don't (yet) have 2TB disks, which is why Vista is > a poor choice for laptops. Vista needs most of a terabyte after > installing all the bug fixes and service packs
Ok, either you are joking (but the wording doesn't make that very clear), or you are just one of those antimicrosoft idiot/trolls. If you were joking, then obviously the latter doesn't apply to you, though you might want to make the joke a little more evident... A fully patched Vista/Windows7 system might require as much as 7-8+ GB, which is, what... about .9% of a Terabyte? I'm not saying that 8GB is not ridiculously high for a core OS install, of course it is...
