On 5/24/05, Thomas Kirchner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > And for goodness sake, don't use the ridiculous CFLAGS suggested by some > others. You'll have so many problems down the road you won't know what > to do with your system. Good ole "-O2 -march=whatever > -fomit-frame-pointer" produces fast, stable code. (Skip the > frame-pointer section if you want debuggable code.) Ricing not > necessary; neither is pulling your hair out because of random segfaults > from badly optimized code.
On which basis do you think they're "ridiculous" ? The *only* dangerous cflags in the list I wrote is -funsafe-math-optimizations. All other are only switches for gcc to choose a better method for doing things. And having a desktop about 20% more responsive is not ridiculous IMO. > Not to mention that no devs (and few users) will help with anything if > you use more CFLAGS. I wouldn't expect any support with the flag mentionned above switched on. However, I would at least expect a "upstream" resolution status on any bug submitted by a guy with -finline-functions or -funit-at-a-time or ... Julien. -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
