============================================================ From: Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 2004/01/04 Sun AM 07:47:02 EST To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [gentoo-user] hashalot
And Portage wants to pull it in on an update? Odd. Shoots a couple holes in my theory, too. Anyway, hashalot is masked on my system. What hardware are you running? ============================================================ Dual PentiumIII-933s, 512Mb RAM ... nVidia GeForce4, a couple IDE hard drives, a cd-writer, a dvd drive, a PS/2 keyboard. There's a little USB mouse hanging out next to my keyboard, plugged into a PS/2 adapter. Then there's a Samsung SyncMaster 955DF monitor (flat screen CRT...ooooh!). Got a really crappy PC-Chips motherboard that I think causes all of the problems I have compiling programs--that, and maybe the RAM chip. Though, it kind of seems my problems started when I put a snake in there. I dunno. I'm using the ~x86 keyword. I don't know if a USE flag would enable hashalot, and I just don't know it. That was redundant. Yes, I have found it pretty odd that when I emerge -u world, it pulls in a TON of packages that are not on my system. A couple I understand, cos they're in my USE flags and haven't been installed yet--e.g., gphoto2. But several of the dependencies listed for gcc were not on my system at all. Hrmmm. Neuros. --***-- 'Esse quam videri.' To be, rather than to appear. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
