Hmm, I didn't say this - Mr. Simpson did. However, yes, ~
means it's unstable for various reasons (ebuild not
tested, app is unstable, etc.) so those of us who need to
run use no ~arch. The no ~arch is stable stuff and Gentoo
seems to be pretty conservative in what they recommmend.
On Fri, 5 Dec 2003 13:07:54 -0800 (PST)
"Eric Paynter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
brett holcomb said:
This quote was made by Daniel Robbins in an OSNews
article. http://www.osnews.com/story.php?news_id=1080
"Gentoo Linux is currently a "bleeding-edge" type distro.
It makes Gentoo Linux the ideal distribution for
hobbyists who get lots of cool toys before everyone else,
but makes Gentoo Linux a questionable choice for
production server environments,"
[...]
Since this was based off of Gentoo 1.0 how relevant is
this for the current 1.4 release in a production server
environment?
Thanks,
Brett
I thought if you wanted "bleeding edge" you used ~ARCH in
your
make.conf. For those of us who like to *use* our machines
rather
than play with then, no "~" means you can expect things
to be as
stable as any other production-quality system. Is that
not the case?
-Eric
--
arctic bears - email and name services
25 email [EMAIL PROTECTED] CA$11.95/month
DNS starting at CA$3.49/month - domains from
CA$25.95/year
for details contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] or visit
http://www.arcticbears.com
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list