"Matthias F. Brandstetter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > ---------- quoting Bjorn Sodergren ---------- >> I would rather see apache 2.0 ebuild renamed to apache2 , so if we >> wanted to use apache 2.0 we could, than make a mistake like this. >> >> Emerge apache2 instead of just apache > > I second that! Wouldn't it be possible to make an extra ebuild > "apache2" for that? Or with a USE flag, like its now (is it so now?)?
I third this, also potentially for other packages, like mysql (just gone from 3.x to 4x) and not to mention VMware where upgrading will break *everyone's* configuration unless they first go out and buy a licence for the new version. IMO this kind of upgrade should happen on purpose because someone chose to do it, not as the result of emerge -u. -- Richard Watson http://www.opencolo.com/ High Value Colocation -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
