On Thu, 2003-06-26 at 21:01, Shawn wrote: > >From whence does the masking of >=sys-devel/binutils-2.14.90.0.4 come? > Should I just "ebuild binutils-2.14.90.0.4.ebuild install", then upgrade > to gcc-3.4? > > Any clues?
I'm not too much into breaking my poor, beaten-up Gentoo, but you should be fine individually merging any dependencies that come up as errors. Well, maybe not 'fine' as in unbroken, but it's an acceptable thing to do. I looked in my package.mask and the only mention I find of binutils is that I shouldn't emerge 2.14.90.0.1. Checking out the changelog might help you more than me. Prepare to be broken, though.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
