On Nov 30, 2011 2:39 PM, "J. Roeleveld" <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > > On Tue, November 29, 2011 7:02 pm, MiÈ™u Moldovan wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 16:04, J. Roeleveld <jo...@antarean.org> wrote: > >> On Tue, November 29, 2011 2:22 pm, VinÃcius Ferrão wrote: > >>> Agreed. > >>> > >>> Filtering Windows executables will only make the system admin to be > >>> recognized as an asshole and windows-hater. > >> > >> I wouldn't class him/her as an ***hole or *******-hater. > >> Simply as an incompetent braindead hobbyist who doesn't know what he/she > >> is doing. > > [snip] > > > > Judging it this way, I see Gmail is also run by horde of incompetent > > braindead hobbyist who don't know what they are doing... :) > > Interesting, I haven't noticed executables being blocked by GMail. > > Will need to test that. >
Not only that; if you wrap the executable inside a non-passworded zip or rar, it will be rejected. Rgds,
