Hi Mișu, I can't see the point of using any of OpenSource Alternatives since all of them have a commercial version to support all features such as the MAPI Connector and AppleMail.
I'm missing something? If I'm wrong, those services will be a viable solution. Thanks for the tip. Sent from my iPhone On 29/10/2011, at 17:21, Mișu Moldovan <du...@gnome.org> wrote: > 2011/10/29 Vinícius Ferrão <viniciusfer...@cc.if.ufrj.br>: > [snip] >> PS: We already have MS Licenses, since I'm in a university with MSDNAA >> program. > > I've worked in environments with MS Exchange as an internal mail > server, using qmail and others as relays, for extra security. The MS > server required specialized expertise and compatible clients, MAPI > being strongly preferred by Exchange. This has been a PITA for users > with free software operating systems. As a last resort, there is an > IMAP connector in MS Exchange, but this software functions poorly as > an IMAP server. > > I would suggest a free-software mail server, with support for MAPI, > Active Sync and the likes, it there really is a need for it (consider > IMAP with idle support and open alternatives for synchronization of > PIM data). Look for the likes of Open-Xchange, SoGo, Zarafa, Zimbra > for full Exchange compatibility. > > HTH, > > -- > mișu >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature