-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 01/07/2014 08:42 PM, Tobias Heinlein wrote:
> On 08.01.2014 02:40, Tobias Heinlein wrote:
>> Our new approach works more like a whitelist;
> 
> "more like a blacklist", that is.
> 
> 
I kind of would like the workaround field to remain (but perhaps be
optional) since I have seen a few vulns that actually did have
functional workarounds. Not absolutely necessary.

Chris Reffett
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iKYEARECAGYFAlLN6G9fFIAAAAAALgAoaXNzdWVyLWZwckBub3RhdGlvbnMub3Bl
bnBncC5maWZ0aGhvcnNlbWFuLm5ldEM2NzU5RjUyMDczREJDQkVDQTBDRkE1NERC
Nzk1QThBNDI2MTgzNTQACgkQ23laikJhg1T9+gCfUCZn/E5AZGvuX1od+rvJPsdH
ZR0AnR/sb6yPZpmiolxM0/HVQmnk3lng
=dm0O
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply via email to