On 12/23/2014 02:30 PM, [email protected] wrote: >> >> are there any future plans for hardened clang? > > Is my question too unspecific or just too stupid for an answer? ;-) >
Probably just that we don't want to send 100 "no" replies to the mailing list. You're stuck waiting for a "yes" instead. If you wait long enough without a "yes," that's a "no" =)
