On Mon, 2024-01-08 at 07:51 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 17:58 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > I cannot really see a delineation between app-text and [dev]-doc. > > > > > > For example, packages like psmark, xmlto, or even texi2html are general > > > format manipulation/conversion tools and IMHO app-text is the right > > > category for them. Also, why would you keep pandoc and manpager in > > > app-text but move xmlto and mandoc out of it? > > > It's a bit blurry. My original idea was to keep app-text/ for general- > > purpose text tools (like text editors), while make dev-doc/ focused on > > formats specific to documentation (like code documentation, manpages). > > We already have app-editors for text editors. For the rest, it seems > very blurry indeed and would leave us with (IMHO too many) borderline > cases. > > You certainly have a point that document processing tools are misplaced > in app-doc. Maybe just move them to app-text, which would be a more > minimal change? >
I suppose that would work for me. I'll wait a few more days, though, to make sure we won't end up moving them twice over a short period. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
