On 13 December 2021 17:24:18 UTC, Mart Raudsepp <l...@gentoo.org> wrote: >Actually I kind of preferred a static name over straight mktemp, >because emktemp supported other cases than a pure mktemp usage does. >But I don't know if it could ever clash things in some weird >situations. That last part is the message I tried to convey in my e-mail, sorry if I wasn't clear enough. Anyway, could anyone with more Postage/PMS experience weigh in on this? If it is indeed safe then the eclass could be modified further, e.g. to use static names with EAPI-8+ but stick with mktemp for older EAPIs just to be safe. -- Marecki
- [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/5] EAPI-8 support in gnome2{,-utils}.... Marek Szuba
- [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] gnome2-utils.eclass: phase ou... Marek Szuba
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] gnome2-utils.eclass: ... Michał Górny
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] gnome2-utils.ecla... Marek Szuba
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] gnome2-utils.... Mart Raudsepp
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] gnome2-u... Marek Szuba
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] gnom... Michał Górny
- Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] ... Mart Raudsepp
- [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/5] gnome2-utils.eclass: support ... Marek Szuba
- [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/5] gnome2.eclass: do not call xd... Marek Szuba
- [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/5] gnome2.eclass: standardise th... Marek Szuba
- [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/5] gnome2.eclass: support EAPI 8 Marek Szuba