On Wed, 2021-06-23 at 11:43 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On mercoledì 23 giugno 2021 11:36:33 CEST Mart Raudsepp wrote: > > + jobs=$(( nproc + 1 )) > > I don't know who historically started the nproc+1 story (it looks to be in > the > handbook too), but it has been demonstrated that nproc+1 is slower than nproc. >
Demonstrated on what? This largely depends on the task in question. In this case, I guess nproc makes more sense and makes things simpler as it's got little I/O overhead. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
