On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:15 PM Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >>>>> On Tue, 22 Jun 2021, David Michael wrote: > > -# Then you add appropriate dependency to your package. The dependency > > -# type(s) should be: > > -# - DEPEND (+ RDEPEND) if the group is already needed at build time, > > -# - RDEPEND if it is needed at install time (e.g. you 'fowners' files > > -# in pkg_preinst) or run time. > > "man acct-group.eclass" currently renders that paragraph like this: > > Then you add appropriate dependency to your package. The dependency > type(s) should be: - DEPEND (+ RDEPEND) if the group is already needed > at build time, - RDEPEND if it is needed at install time (e.g. you > 'fowners' files > in pkg_preinst) or run time. > > In other words, there's very little formatting support in eclassdoc. > > > +# Then you add appropriate dependencies to your package. Note that the > > build > > +# system might need to resolve names, too. The dependency type(s) should > > be: > > +# - BDEPEND if the group must be resolvable at build time (e.g. it is used > > by > > +# 'fowners' in src_install), > > +# - IDEPEND if it must be resolvable at install time (e.g. it is used by > > +# 'fowners' in pkg_preinst), > > +# - RDEPEND in every case. > > So, while at it, could you reformat it that it will be better readable > in the generated man page? > > (Same issue in acct-user.eclass.)
I made these changes and pushed the commits to https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/21377 in case that's easier to track changes and merge. I could resend everything if that's preferred. Thanks. David
