On 2020-10-05 20:01, Marek Szuba wrote:
I have decided to add support for dev-lang/lua:0 because having thought quite a lot about the transition path from Lua ebuilds as they are to the new eclasses, it seems to be the most sane approach. Still, I hope this will not stay around for too long.
NOT pushed because having poked around various Lua revdeps in the tree I realised that with the way Lua detection works in e.g. CMake, the only way of making sure an ebuild really honours the values of LUA_TARGETS / LUA_SINGLE_TARGET, or indeed LUA_COMPAT, is to have multiple Lua versions installed side by side. In other words, migrating ebuilds to lua{,-single}.eclass prior to unmasking dev-lang/lua:5.x could in fact result in quite a mess.
Nothing particularly noteworthy about LuaJIT support, possibly apart from the fact that we take advantage of it being allegedly being a drop-in replacement for lua-5.1.
Pushed. -- MS
OpenPGP_0xD4945FFDD7FE7E37_and_old_rev.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
