On Thursday, 13 February 2020 5:40:46 AM AEDT Matt Turner wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 9:59 AM William Hubbs <willi...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 06:54:19PM +1100, Sam Jorna (wraeth) wrote: > > > On Monday, 10 February 2020 7:55:01 AM AEDT Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +0000, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > > > > Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 > > > > > lines of > > > > > Manifest?! > > > > > > > > Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments > > > > everywhere, all the time and just get irritated for no benefit to > > > > Gentoo? > > > > > > Perhaps I'm the one being ignorant here, but why are we lambasting > > > someone for seeking clarification about an unusual inclusion on a > > > review thread?> > > I wasn't going to say anything, but I can't let this go by without > > commenting. > > > > Sam is correct. Maybe the tone is a bit off, (and that is debatable), > > but this definitely can be seen as a legit question, regardless of other > > things Michael has posted. > > Unfortunately it's not about a single issue or email. It's a > consistent pattern that multiple people have asked him to rein in over > a long period. :(
Without going into specifics, veremit and I have certainly had our 'differences of opinion' in the past; but I don't believe this is one of those occasions. Calling out bad actors (not saying veremit is one, I just mean in the general sense) is an unfortunate but important task, but call them out on bad behaviour, not for what appears to be an impassioned but otherwise unremarkable query. -- Sam Jorna (wraeth) GnuPG ID: 0xD6180C26
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
