On Fri, Dec 6, 2019 at 5:51 AM Alexis Ballier <aball...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > On Fri, 6 Dec 2019 04:33:36 -0500 > Tim Harder <radher...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > On 2019-12-06 Fri 04:03, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > > it's not just like repoman and cvs since repoman commit did push ;) > > > it will never be perfect but i really like repoman commit to refuse > > > to even commit if there's something obviously wrong > > > > I'm more of the opinion (and am working towards that practicality in > > terms of runtime speed) that a subset of QA checks should be run as a > > git hook which would cause push failures on certain classes of bad > > commits. > > > There should be both. Amending the 23rd commit message because one > mistyped a semicolon is kind of a PITA.
It is? git rebase -i HEAD~23 Is that what you think is a pain in the ass, or do you not know about interactive rebase? :)
