>>>>> On Mon, 26 Nov 2018, Michał Górny wrote: > Specification > =============
> The container format > -------------------- > The gpkg package container is an uncompressed .tar achive whose filename > should use ``.gpkg.tar`` suffix. This archive contains the following > members, all placed in a single directory whose name matches > the basename of the package file, in order: I see no value in adding another directory indirection, and it will add more overhead. Also, AFAICS the tar|tar pipeline that you previously suggested won't work any more (or would at least require additional arguments). > 1. The package identifier file ``gpkg-1.txt`` (required). > [...] > The implementations must include a package identifier file named > ``gpkg-1.txt``. The filename includes package format version; > implementations should reject packages which do not contain this file > as unsupported format. > The file can have any contents. Normally, it should be empty. If the file is empty, why is it named gpkg-1.txt (instead of just gpkg-1)? Ulrich
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
