On Mon, 26 Nov 2018 20:34:56 +0800 Benda Xu <hero...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> This is a serious regression for Prefix and caught a lot of users > without a warning. Could you please discuss on this kind of changes in > the mailing list beforehand? Discussing this change on the list? I haven't touched the eclass, I simply fixed the xmw-abandoned netsurf package which had been broken for 3 months prior to that (and by broken, I don't mean only on Prefix. Why talk about 1-1 features in those situations?). Fixing packages without touching eclasses doesn't require gentoo-dev review. Also, netsurf doesn't have any prefix keyword. Some of the lower-level libs have ~m68k-mint, but it isn't clear why because the only non-netsurf revdep to those libs is net-libs/libwebsockets and it isn't keyworded for prefix either. Please, open a ticket on the appropriate package with a description of an actual breakage and I'll be deligthed to address it. Regards, Virgil
pgpafpvucDBRx.pgp
Description: PGP signature
