W dniu czw, 19.07.2018 o godzinie 10∶06 -0400, użytkownik Mike Gilbert napisał: > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > W dniu wto, 17.07.2018 o godzinie 10∶40 -0400, użytkownik Mike Gilbert > > napisał: > > > On Tue, Jul 17, 2018 at 4:41 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > > Python 3.5+ introduces parallel build support in distutils. Take > > > > advantage of that by passing appropriate -j option. Since distutils > > > > does not support an equivalent of --load-average, default to the number > > > > of CPUs+1 when unspecified. > > > > > > How do we disable this in individual ebuilds when we inevitably run > > > into problematic packages? > > > > My guess would be, same as emake: > > > > distutils-r1_python_compile -j1 > > > > (I haven't tested it though) > > This will affect stable ebuilds that have python3_5 or python3_6 > enabled. It would be a good idea to test it on a reasonable sample of > ebuilds first. > > Alternatively, we could enable it for python3_7 first and see what > kind of fallout that produces. >
Given that we still have a reasonably small set of EAPI 7 ebuilds, how about EAPI 7 for all Pythons + python3_7 for all EAPIs? ;-) -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
