W dniu nie, 08.07.2018 o godzinie 15∶02 +0200, użytkownik Kristian Fiskerstrand napisał: > On 07/08/2018 08:53 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Is safe git syncing implemented already? If not, maybe finish it first and > > cover both with a single news item. Git is going to be more efficient here, > > so people may want to learn they have an alternative. > > Why complicate things, and increase wait for something that benefits > most users, just to give alternatives to a few using non-default sync > mechanism. Securing git distribution is a whole different ballpark. >
Let me rephrase. Let's say I'm using rsync. This new feature is something positive but it breaks my use case (for one of the listed reasons -- overlayfs, inode use, small fs cache). After reading this news item, I learn that my only option is to disable the new feature. Now, I would appreciate being told that there's an alternate sync method that handles secure updates without having all those drawbacks. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
