W dniu czw, 04.01.2018 o godzinie 19∶22 +0100, użytkownik Ulrich Mueller napisał: > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Jan 2018, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 5:23 AM, Pacho Ramos <pa...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > > I have seen this is only used by: > > > app-arch/xz-utils > > > dev-libs/gmp > > > dev-libs/libpcre > > > dev-libs/mpc > > > dev-libs/mpfr > > > net-nds/openldap > > > sys-libs/gdbm > > > sys-libs/ncurses > > > sys-libs/readline > > > sys-process/audit > > > > > > Maybe we could deprecate it and try to drop it in the future :/ > > As Soap touched on earlier, this should probably not be > > deprecated/removed until a solution compatible with Paludis and > > pkgcore is implemented. > > A couple of options for that: > > 1. Add functionality similar to preserve-libs to these alternate > > package managers. This is unlikely to happen. > > There may also be Portage users without preserve-libs in FEATURES. > > > 2. Slot the libraries so that the old versions may remain installed > > in a PMS-compatible way. This is often a pain to actually implement. > > I don't think that this would fly. You'd have to split packages like > xz-utils which install binaries, otherwise there would be collisions > between slots. >
See: sys-libs/ncurses, except for the random in-place 5->0 SLOT change that caused a lot of mayhem. -- Best regards, Michał Górny
