On 12/21/17 12:19 AM, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Wed, Dec 20, 2017 at 06:29:57PM +0100, Hans de Graaff wrote: >> On Wed, 2017-12-20 at 18:02 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >>> >>> sys-process/vixie-cron >> >> My understanding is that vixie-cron is no longer maintained and sys- >> process/cronie is the drop-in replacement that is now also suggested as >> the default cron in the handbook. >> >> https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/d898f86f805909eb72aba61d >> 2dca8523 >> >> I seem to recall a more recent discussion about this as well, but can't >> find it at the moment. >> >> Perhaps it is time to mask vixie-cron for removal? > > I just updated the SELinux patch on vixie-cron and stabilized it a while > ago, it works fine and doesnt need all that much maintenance. I vote > keep it, i'll look after it. If it has some big architectural issues > later then we can last-rite it but its been reliable so far. > > I added myself to the Cron project with blueness. > > -- Jason > >
Jason, much appreciated. Also thanks Michal for noticing that cron needed love. -- Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D. Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened] E-Mail : bluen...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
