On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:57 PM, R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Dec 8, 2017 at 7:20 PM, Georg Rudoy <0xd34df...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2017-12-08 2:43 GMT-05:00 R0b0t1 <r03...@gmail.com>: >>> >>> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 3:39 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> >>> wrote: >>> > On 12/04/2017 10:36 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: >>> >> Sorry last one, directed to Alec, but all should read. >>> > >>> > I hope you really mean that, we've all heard you complaining about this >>> > too many times already. >>> > >>> >>> Inasmuch as a random person is likely to care, glancing at the >>> messages shows wltjr is the more convincing of the parties involved. >>> Having actually wasted time trying to figure out what is going on >>> there is no mention of what ever happened from Gentoo that indicates >>> anything improper took place. >> >> Single-point samples are not really representative. >> >> The messages wltjr sent and the bugs/PRs/etc he linked convinced me in >> quite the contrary, at least, about the legitimacy of the current >> actions. >> > > I am having trouble understanding you, unfortunately. It seems like > you agree with his removal from the list. I suppose that is okay, > originally I just tuned the conversations out because they were noisy. > > The summary I have tried to provide is: despite the fact wltjr does > not seem to have a filter, he has so far not actually been incorrect. > The developers involved, on the other hand, have been contradicting > themselves since I first saw this around 2013. At some point they > appear to have provided him an "out" and would have let him apologize, > but he wants an apology from them. >
Buried in his messages there are apologies, but the sticking point seems to be that he fails to recognize the original actions as reasonable.
