Am Dienstag, 2. Mai 2017, 14:32:13 CEST schrieb Ulrich Mueller: > >>>>> On Tue, 2 May 2017, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: > > Also very common is that he changes fully qualified package names > > (which is the correct syntax per [1]) into fully qualified package > > atoms (which is the legacy syntax). Bug 616260 is one such example. > > > > [1] https://bugs.gentoo.org/page.cgi?id=fields.html > > Can't the stable-bot enforce the correct syntax?
A little bird already mentioned to me that the stable bot ignores bugs filed by one particular developer, who insists to repeatedly fill in invalid data and can't be taught otherwise. (And that's just about the maximum level of "enforcement" possible here. Should be effective on the long run though.) -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org Gentoo Linux developer (council, perl, libreoffice)
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
