Ühel kenal päeval, L, 18.02.2017 kell 22:03, kirjutas Mart Raudsepp: > Ühel kenal päeval, L, 18.02.2017 kell 19:47, kirjutas Michał Górny: > > commit: 7207a292b2591dde5cbd336470bed3c11617a8e1 > > Commit: Michał Górny <mgorny <AT> gentoo <DOT> org> > > CommitDate: Sat Feb 18 19:47:25 2017 +0000 > > URL: https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=72 > > 07 > > a292 > > > > dev-util/wxglade: python-single-r1, EAPI=6 > > While I appreciate work done to do this conversion finally, what was > the reason to bypass the maintainers after being explicitly told on > IRC > to not do so? > Since when have we entered a free-for-all state of maintenance in > Gentoo? > I would like to know the state of affairs, so I know for future > reference what can I expect and what I can do to packages that I do > not > explicitly maintain either. > > And yes, I am aware there was a pending bump request for a couple > years. I'm still dealing with backlog after getting back to tree > maintenance. > > > Mart Raudsepp, > thoroughly confused about current maintenance policies
Hello? wxglade was just one example that affected me, and actually a bad example, but I see constant commits to anything and everything by people not maintaining something, to teams that have not declared their packages open for fixing by anyone nor without Acked-by's; coupled with constant talks of everything being crap, ebuilds being retarded and whatnot. Not a very motivational speak, I must add. What is going on? Do I need to revise how I would judge an ebuild quiz question 12 answer for any future mentees? Mart Raudsepp
