On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 03:49:30 +1100
Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > Can you please avoid reintroducing the term "atom" there, when we
> > are trying to get rid of it elsewhere [1]? Note that PMS doesn't
> > define the term [2].
>
> Any suggestions for improved text? Ideally it would be
> stabilisation/keywording agnostic as the same field is used in both
> components.
How about "atoms". We've been using that for ages (regardless of what
PMS authors think) so why change it now? Alternatively, I would propose
to call them "bikesheds" as that will work just as well as any other
label and will succinctly refer to the creative process that made it
a replacement for "atoms".
jer
