On 19/11/16 19:04, Michał Górny wrote: > Could we maybe include some place (metadata.xml?) to state what is > the best way to test a package? I'm thinking it could include things > like: > > - whether the test of the package are reliable, > > - whether runtime testing is required and what kind of, > > - how likely it is that revdeps need to be checked. > > For example, in LLVM I would like to ask arch testers to always check > a few common clang calls. >
I'd really like to collect information like this in a machine-readable format, but it would be tricky to get right.
