On 11/17/2016 07:03 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
> On 11/16/2016 02:25 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 16, 2016 at 01:54:05PM -0500, Brian Evans wrote:
>>> Non-existent MISC files are ignored.
> 
> That has been true since Manifest2 was implemented, in Portage 2.1. It
> has allowed those who don't want ChangeLogs to exclude them via rsync
> excludes.
> 
>>> But when they do exist, they are checked like every other file which may
>>> be a misinterpretation of the GLEP.
>> The tree-signing GLEP that updates Manifest2 is clear to state that MISC
>> files which mismatch between disk and Manifest should generate a
>> non-fatal warning unless some strict mode is in effect.
> 
> The mismatch case is not supported yet. Can I get a link to the relevant
> portion of the GLEP? The most detailed information I could find on MISC
> entries was here:
> 
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/GLEP:60#MISC
> 
Fwiw, from my own perspective; not allowing mismatches if file exists
makes perfect sense.

Also GLEP says:
 * MISC entries where the file is missing may optionally be ignored as
by non-strict package managers.
 * It should be possible to install a package while all MISC entries
have been deleted from the tree.

-- 
Kristian Fiskerstrand
OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to