On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 8:13 AM, Michael Palimaka <kensing...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > Just to be clear, I'm not advocating banning runtime testing. I just > think that, considering the state of the stable tree, we should consider > very careful in which situations we actually gain value from it. That's > for another thread, however. I deliberately worded the document so that > the final decision on the exact level of testing required (runtime or > otherwise) is between the person filing the stabilisation request and > the person actioning it. >
++ -- Rich
