On Fri, 11 Nov 2016 02:31:29 +0100 Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> Also note that the suggested set of operators is incomplete. There are > "<== less than or equal to" and ">== greater than or equal to", but > the corresponding ones for "less than" and "greater than" are missing. > So this would remove part of the existing functionality. Which was quite thoroughly explained. But I can repeat it for you if you insist: revisions are countable, so there's really no problem in doing >== -r2 instead of > -r1, and <== -r2 instead of < -r3. With the *== forms being IMHO cleaner since you clearly indicate the range of revisions, without making someone wonder whether you didn't accidentally forget = in there. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgph7cJrYLIMf.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
