On 09/06/2016 03:38 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote:
> On 06/09/16 14:35, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>> On 09/06/2016 03:19 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
>>> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 8:51 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> I believe you're overthinking it, if we make it a guideline to include a
>>>> section of the eclass (as many already have) that does e.g (take this
>>>> for example purposes) there is no EAPI/PMS change needed
>>>> case "${EAPI:-0}" in
>>>> 4|5|6)
>>>> ;;
>>>> *) die "EAPI=${EAPI} is not supported" ;;
>>>>
>>> I think the question becomes then what do we do about eclasses that
>>> don't follow the guideline?
>> A natural step might be QA team involved in such cases?
>>
> Did you just volunteer to join QA there, Kristian ?! ;)
> hehe :) If they want me to contribute there they can ask. I'm certainly not fundamentally opposed, but I believe they overall have a good project going already so I'm allocating my (sadly resource constrained) Gentoo-time elsewhere. -- Kristian Fiskerstrand OpenPGP certificate reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
