I'd like to chime in if I may. I've found "VERIFIED" to be needless. Especially in cases where I have logs or whatnot, having to prove the bug is there is tedious.
Shouldn't the existence of the report be evidence enough? On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:39 AM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand <k...@gentoo.org> > wrote: > > On 06/17/2016 07:05 PM, Brian Dolbec wrote: > >> > >> Then everyone PLEASE stop referring to the Gentoo ebuild tree as > >> portage. Reserve portage for the upstream PACKAGE MANAGER. > > > > indeed > > > > Agree, though this wasn't the sense I meant it in (in case there was > any confusion). > > 1. There is the Gentoo Repo (which I always try to describe using those > words). > > 2. Then there is the sys-apps/portage package in the Gentoo repo. > > 3. And then there is the portage upstream that occasionally makes > releases that end up as #2. > > It is between 2-3 that we need to distinguish here. > > I agree with the suggestion that context is sufficient already. > > -- > Rich > >
