On 06/13/2016 11:24 PM, Alexander Berntsen wrote: > In addition to what Peter Stuge (correctly) identifies as needing to > change, there also needs to be a modularisation of Gentoo-curated > package repositories. > What sort of modularization are you talking about? Would we suggest something like GNOME, KDE, XFCE, Mate, Cinnamon, et al getting their own overlays? dev-lang/foo getting its own overlay, etc?
To some degree, that will simplify some people's trees and quicken emerge, but then it just pushes maintainance to a part that most users don't really mess with much (repos.conf) You can achieve mostly the same end via your own git repo at /usr/local/ and pulling overlays in via either layman or git submodules, for overlays that aren't already in layman. zugaina and layman are great tools that could use a bit more polish, and could be either adopted or assisted as an official part of the handbook. The issue here is similar to the issue Ubuntu and Debian face with PPAs. There's no guarantee on their quality, and if an overlay becomes popular then there may be pressure put on the Gentoo tree to adopt whatever the popular overlay has. This could be detrimental *or* beneficial, depending on what the changes are. tldr modularization sounds good on paper but I don't see it being beneficial in the long run. I would be happy with the requirements to get into layman being somewhat relaxed and/or halfway automated so users can host anywhere they want, get listed in layman as "not vetted" but still available, and then some sort of process or mechanism to go from "unvetted" to "vetted", and if they're lucky, "official". It would require less shuffling of resources, as well. -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
