On Tue, 07 Jun 2016 15:56:16 +0100 "M. J. Everitt" <m.j.ever...@iee.org> wrote:
> On 07/06/16 16:44, james wrote: > > On 06/07/2016 09:25 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > >> Wouldn't removing it from repositories.xml have pretty much the same > >> effect? > >> > >> Also, i think we should make the unreviewed repo public then, so > >> people can get the newest ebuilds. > > > > Perhaps a deprecation period of a year, with a gentoo wiki page that > > lists the packages found @sunrise, is a good idea? > > > > > A year is a very short time in software terms .. maybe 5 years ... !! > But freezing it, with the intention of removing from repos.xml in 5 > years time seems reasonable to me. I'm against keeping it in repos.xml for more than a month, considering the current (huge) state of breakage it is in. Other repositories with similar breakage were already removed. -- Best regards, Michał Górny <http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/>
pgp5G8jbhhNTT.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
