-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 On 04/10/2016 10:09 PM, NP-Hardass wrote: > Greetings all, > > As all potential new eclasses are supposed to be discussed here, I > thought I'd file a message and see if anyone had anything to > contribute on the matter. > > I'm in the midst of a major version bump for the entirety of the > MATE desktop environment, consisting of 40-50 packages. There is a > huge amount of repetition in my ebuilds, and a lot of things are > formulaic (SRC_URI, HOMEPAGE, EGIT_REPO_URI, inherits, src_prepare, > etc). As such, I think that moving all of that to an eclass would > greatly simplify my life and my ebuilds, so I thought I'd look into > creating an eclass. > > Any opinions either way? Thanks in advance. > > > Sounds like a prime use case for an eclass. If I were in your position I'd be sure to get reviews from more experienced eclass writers along the way to make sure you're not setting yourself up for bad API design. - -- Daniel Campbell - Gentoo Developer OpenPGP Key: 0x1EA055D6 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net fpr: AE03 9064 AE00 053C 270C 1DE4 6F7A 9091 1EA0 55D6 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2
iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJXC07lAAoJEAEkDpRQOeFwqA4P/0GRudtO39UawnAQRW+N3/Un JyyFN5Oej9bIJpMYyE7tz77N1SdUjla6yW/2WaL/HtzTeeETjp/ThlOXvweYE367 mCz7OJ/q9Fo20TGfPaBI0xIvlcmv+BDdTpjJc1czRlC+1j+mLa9RDG+byMiwnQIa QVK3sUYAvypQqGIOZSlM4nCRwVT1CSBnSDlaJqlUIUJNciY9iqXyKwzCX0xUJCpo pQHH2S05Bhx8c0rpK0x/MkqfhTAaLBPQDd/7Szozuy/MTb3Zx3aIV4bE0Z5D5uYq B5ReTw0D0/cZqi9dA5HeEqMwEJJm6DRvs/km9bX07LDsIm0otvMCho3LzUY76SyS 4wtbNrHVBdQmM1XF9RdJ8Nd6HA3oozBwgs7tNRj0mLNG0irpc4q3CdC0ZYjklYVZ KzTS2f7j1nnBvMynVYehlhNLUzpKwnUNIo1SFLrc5W/3ZQb9RtuwUYerP6sSoL8E och22zjtD8PesT5exTXf5M3DRB5xO6kDcdCdzASdEpdjcLrCt3aDZTejhFrIAiJq 0LpdiZMyeC/z8bLKVGpMuBcZkD+eI9YzzdGC4FDU8AnEV17lGZfptqbUcGYL82wC 9FdlXieeTUuFWwIq0uM1gm4Sr1RMZ0/+Y/dqQBAKM+gFbZ8V+th5c8nKbdDt+I4o 4WOoBEg3fMnwPxga7DGT =ks2J -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
