Hi guys, On Wed, 20 Jan 2016 13:40:04 -0500 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>On 20 Jan 2016 12:39, Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 12:34 PM, Mike Frysinger <vap...@gentoo.org> >> wrote: >> > On 18 Jan 2016 00:57, Joshua Kinard wrote: >> >> On 01/17/2016 14:57, Michał Górny wrote: >> >> > sys-apps/kexec-tools : >> >> >> >> Better suited for base-system, maybe? >> >> >> >> > sys-fs/jfsutils : >> >> >> >> Definitely base-system, as xfsprogs is already maintained by >> >> them. >> > >> > sounds fine for both. generally fs tools probably should live >> > under base-system for consistency. >> >> Nothing wrong with consistency, but I'd prefer a package to be placed >> under the base-system project because the base-system project members >> intend to maintain it. I don't want to see packages placed into >> projects simply because they're similar to other packages in those >> projects if it means they'll just be neglected. >> >> I have no idea which is the case here. If the base-system >> maintainers want to maintain these two packages, have at it! If >> not, leave it as maintainer-needed. > >if base-system@ isn't going to maintain it, we'll punt it from the herd >-mike well, I already added myself as maintainer of sys-fs/jfsutils and I happen to be a base-system maintainer. So goal already reached :) Kind regards Lars -- Lars Wendler Gentoo package maintainer GPG: 21CC CF02 4586 0A07 ED93 9F68 498F E765 960E 9B39 Attention! New gpg key! See (self signed server cert for now) http://www.gentoofan.org/blog/index.php?/archives/9-New-gpg-keys.html
pgpzZ8_9nS1tr.pgp
Description: Digitale Signatur von OpenPGP
