Actually, git log understands if you specify path for it (especially after --)...
03.11.2015 02:05, Daniel Campbell пишет: > On 11/01/2015 04:22 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > On 11/1/15 7:16 AM, Patrick Lauer wrote: > >> Ahoi, > >> > >> I'm getting mildly very irritated with the lack of easily > >> accessible ChangeLogs for our packages. > >> > >> Apparently updating them stopped some time in August, so now > >> there are some outdated ChangeLogs that don't really serve any > >> purpose, and the easiest way for users to figure out why > >> something changed is to yell at the clumsy gitweb.g.o interface. > >> So instead of grep we now need lots of patience. > >> > >> This does not look reasonable to me. > >> > >> Can we please either properly remove ChangeLogs and tell people > >> to not be curious about changes, or make them useful again? > >> > >> Thanks, > >> > >> A Gentoo User. > >> > > I don't have strong feelings about this, but I'm happy with `git > > log` to tell me what's going on with packages. I would be okay > > with the ChangeLog files just being archived and removed. > > > Is there a way for us (devs and users both) to only get `git log` > results from a specific directory or package? I'm aware we could pipe > git log to grep, but that seems hackish, like git has a better way to > isolate log entries. > >
